This stage orients all edges on the cube (EO) while simultaneously placing the DF and DB edges (Line). This reduces the cube to the <L,R,U> group, meaning the rest of the cube can be solved by turning only the L, R and U faces.
EOLine takes an average of ~6.127 moves and a maximum of 9 moves,^{[2]} but is without doubt the most difficult part of the ZZ method. For this reason, it is often divided into two substages: (1) Edge orientation followed by (2) placement of the line edges. Also known as "EO+Line".
Contents
 Edge Orientation Detection
 Edge Orientation Strategy
 Edge Orientation Cases
 Combining the EO and Line Phases
 Optimising EOLine
 Fingertricks and Looking Ahead Into F2L
 Example EOLine Solves
Back to Main Page
Edge Orientation Detection
An edge is defined as oriented if it can be solved using only R, L, U and D face turns. If an edge cannot be solved using these face turns then it is a misoriented or 'bad' edge.
The following will tell you if you have a misoriented 'bad' edge.
Where colours are stated it is assumed that the cube is held with
white/yellow on top and green/blue on front.
 Look at the U/D faces. If you see:
 L/R colour (orange/red) it's bad.
 F/B colour (green/blue) means you need to look round the side of the edge. If the side is U/D (white/yellow) it is bad.
 Then look at the F/B faces of the Eslice (middle layer).
The same rules apply. If you see:
 L/R colour (orange/red) it's bad.
 F/B colour (green/blue) means you need to look round the side of the edge. If the side is U/D (white/yellow) it is bad.
Using this method, look at each edge in the Ulayer onebyone, positively identifying any bad edges. Then look at the Dlayer, applying the same rules to each edge. Finally look at the four remaining Eslice edges, remembering to scan the F/B faces of these edges first, applying the same rule. Keep track of bad edges by placing a finger on each one found.
Edge Orientation Strategy
A quarter turn of the F or B face causes its oriented edges to become misoriented, and its misoriented edges to become oriented. Using F/B quarter turns to orient up to four edges at a time is the core technique behind edge orientation. NOTE: F2 and B2 turns do not affect edge orientation. The following is a basic strategy for orienting edges, based on the number of misoriented edges on the cube.
 0: Done, all edges are oriented.
Chances: 1/2048 ~ 0.05%  2: Move 1 to F/B and make an F/B quarter turn, swap newly oriented edge with second misoriented one, without disturbing any other F/B edges, and make the final F/B turn.
Chances: 66/2048 ~ 3.22%  4: Move all misoriented edges to F/B and make an F/B quarter turn.
Chances: 495/2048 ~ 24.17%  6:Move 3 misoriented edges to F/B and make an F/B turn, 4 remain.
OR Treat as 4 + 2
Generally less efficient as it requires three F/B turns, compared to the two required in the 3 + 3 strategy.
Chances: 924/2048 ~ 45.12%  8: Treat as 4 + 4
Chances: 495/2048 ~ 24.17%  10: Treat as 4 + 4 + 2
If you have this case, keep track of the two good edges, rather than the 10 bad edges. Use the initial moves to move the two good edges out of F/B, then turn both the F and B faces. Finally deal with the two remaining bad edges.
Chances: 66/2048 ~ 3.22%  12: Treat as 4 + 4 + 4
This is a very rare case, but if you're lucky enough to encounter it, immediately do an F and B turn and you're left with four bad edges.
Chances: 1/2048 ~ 0.05%
These rules of thumb should help guide your decision making when manipulating bad edges:
 It is generally more efficient to chose the F/B face with most bad edges already on it for your initial F/B turn.
 It is generally less efficient if placement of a bad edge into F/B removes another bad edge from F/B.
 In cases with six or more bad edges, it is generally more efficient to eliminate the bad edges using both F and B faces rather than just one.
 In cases with six or more bad edges, it is generally more efficient if placement of a bad edge into a F/B face also places another edge into the opposite F/B face.
 Execution of F/B moves with only two opposite bad edges placed is futile from an edge orientation perspective, but can be useful for manipulation of line edges.
Edge Orientation Cases
Because there are over 2000 distinct edge orientation cases, it would be impractical to memorise an algorithm for each one. Instead, learn to recognise familiar EO patterns and the techniques which can be used to solve them.
In the vast majority of solves, edge orientation is carried out in groups of four. For this reason, a range of fouredge cases is presented below, along with a complete set of techniques to place them into the Fface. These techniques can just as easily be reflected to apply to the Bface. Many cases have more than one optimal solution, allowing a degree of freedom to help with placing edges on the opposite face, or setting up the line edges.
Placing edges individually
Using F2/B2 to create openings
Moving three edges simultaneously
Moving two edges simultaneously
Combining 2edge move with F2
Removing placed edges
Combining edge removal and F2
Combining the EO and Line Phases
When edge orientation starts to become more familiar, it's possible
to start planning the line and integrating it into the edgeorientation phase to achieve
EOLine in one step. Start by integrating the line in easy edge orientation cases (for
example, where only two or four edges are misoriented) and progress onto more complex
cases as skill level improves.
The easiest way to integrate the line is to predict where the line edges
will end up after edge orientation, so that final placement can be planned and executed
without looking. This is done by mentally tracking where the line edges move during
edge orientation. Don't focus much effort into planning moves for the line itself
because it involves very few moves and will eventually become second nature with practice.
The most important thing is accurately predicting where the line edges will end up.
Although tracking line edges sounds difficult there are strategies which can make it
easier. Aiming to minimise movement of the line edges during EO can greatly reduce
the mental effort required to track them. In some cases it's possible to orient edges without
disturbing one of the line edges. In these cases only one line edge needs to be tracked.
These situations are particularly useful if line edges are already in the Dlayer.
Optimising EOLine
Although using line prediction is undoubtedly faster than EO+Line, it still
uses the same number of moves. By choosing the right way to orient edges it is
possible to make line placement much more efficient, and sometimes eliminate the
need for it altogether. The following describes how this can be done.
We want to create a line in the D face. No matter how the line is created, it eventually boils down to the following:
Goal 1: Line in DF/DB position
Goal 2: Line in DR/DL position followed by D/D' turn  less desirable since it takes 1 extra move
With these two goals in mind we may rank possible line edge positions according to their distance in moves from either of the goal states (using HTM):
Distance from goal state 1 (group 1):
0: DF, DB (oriented)
1: UF, UB, DR, DL (oriented)
1: RF, LF, RB, LB (misoriented)
Distance from goal state 2 (group 2):
0: DL, DR (oriented)
1: FL BL, FR, BR, UL, UR, DF, DB (oriented)
2: FU, FD, BU, BD (misoriented)
Placing both line edges into either group 1 or group 2 will result in a more efficient line unless they're positioned in such a way that moving one into line disturbs the other. Use the positions in italics with caution for this reason.
It turns out that if one edge ends up an group 1, while the other ends up in group 2 it always leads to a difficult line (2+ moves, most cases 3+).
An efficient line can be therefore be achieved by trying to move both edge pieces into group 1 during edge orientation. If this requires too many setup moves, aim for group 2, but try to avoid ending up with 1 line edge in each group.
Fingertricks and Looking Ahead Into F2L
Having a move efficient EOLine is very important, and should always be something to strive for. However, there are occasions when sacrificing one or two moves will allow for easier finger tricks and better lookahead potential. In the previous section it was mentioned that aiming for a group 1 line is often more efficient. However, using group 1 means that EOLine ends with either an F/B move (sometimes F2/B2) which hampers smooth execution and look ahead for the F2L transition. If preference is made for building lines in group 2, then EOLine will always end with a D move which means transition into F2L requires no regrip and allows full visibility of the Ulayer and Eslice to scan for the first block.
Example EOLine Solves

Scramble: F U2 D2 B2 U' F U' R' L' D R'
Observations: This case has 4 bad edges in positions UF, UL, DL and DB. The basic edge orientation strategy will place all 4 edges into an F/B side and do an F/B turn. The DF line edge is in the DR position and is oriented. The DB edge is in the LU position and is misoriented.
EOLine: D' L' R' U2 B
Explanation: The initial D' move placed the oriented DF edge into its line position. The L' R' U2 moves placed all misoriented edges into the Bface, and placed the misoriented DB edge into a group 1 position. The final B turn oriented the 4 bad edges and completed the line.

Scramble: F' B' U L2 D B R2 L2 U'
Observations: 8 misoriented edges, elimination in two groups of 4. Four bad edges already present in F face. DB and DF both in group 1 positions in B face
EOLine: F D B U2 F2
Explanation: The initial F turn immediately removes 4 bad edges to leave 4 remaining. The D turn positions the only remaining bad edge not already in the B face. The B turn orients the last 4 edges, leaving the DF and DB edges in group 1 positions so that the line can be completed with U2 F2.

Scramble: R F2 B' D' L U2 L2 D2 B
Observations: 6 misoriented edges. Most likely elimination as 3 + 3 since generally more efficient. Both DF and DB edges are misoriented. DF edge in group 1 position, while DB edge is close to a group 1 position.
EOLine: B' U2 D' L' B F2
Explanation: The initial B' turn removes 3 bad edges to leave 4 remaining for elimination. The following U2 turn does two things: Places a bad edge and moves DF closer to its group1 goal position. D' and L' then place 2 more bad edges into the Bface, while placing the DB edge into a group1 position. B orients the last 4 bad edges and places the DB edge, and finally F2 places the DF edge to complete the line.

Scramble: R' D F2 R B' U F' D' F2
Observations: 8 edges are misoriented, so the basic orientation strategy will be to eliminate 4 edges, twice. The Fface has 3 bad edges, which is more than the Bface which has 2. The DB edge is in its correct position and oriented  also a group 1 position. The DF edge is in its correct position but misoriented  a group 2 position.
EOLine: U F L B' D U B
Explanation: The initial U turn fills the Fface with bad edges and F eliminates them. At this point the DFedge is in a group 2 position, while the DBedge is in a group 1 position. The following Lturn brings the DFedge into a group 1 position, but now both line edges now perpendicular to each other in the Dface. For this reason a B' turn is made to move the DB edge out of the way and allow the DFedge to be placed. Meanwhile the number and location of bad edges is unaffected. The following D and U turns place the 2 remaining bad edges, as well as the DFedge. The final Bturn orients the last 4 bad edges and places the DBedge.
Back to Main Page
Last updated: 7^{th} August 2016